Рњрµсѓс‚рѕ Рісѓс‚сђрµс‡рё Рќрўр’ - Р’сѓрµрјсѓ Сѓрірѕс‘ Рёрјсџ?! (19-01-202... Apr 2026

: The episode title poses a rhetorical question—does everything truly deserve its "own" (new) name, or are some names "eternal" because of the history they represent? Conclusion

The episode concludes that names are more than just labels; they are instruments of political influence. The debate in "Mesto Vstrechi" serves as a microcosm of the broader struggle for cultural hegemony in Eastern Europe. The program underscores that while names may change on a map, the historical events they represent remain a permanent part of a nation's collective consciousness. : The episode title poses a rhetorical question—does

: Within Russia, the discussion often touches upon the restoration of historical names (e.g., pre-revolutionary names) versus maintaining Soviet-era toponyms. The question remains: how do we balance different layers of the past? The program underscores that while names may change

: A significant portion of the debate focused on the actions of Baltic states and Ukraine, where Soviet and Russian-linked names are being systematically replaced. The guests debated whether this is an "erasure of heritage" or a sovereign right to redefine national narratives. : A significant portion of the debate focused

Based on the program's typical format and the specific context of early 2024, the essay-like reflection on this episode highlights: